Rex Medical L.P. v. Angiotech Pharmaceuticals (US), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “being forced to comply with contractual obligations that a party voluntarily entered into is simply not the sort of ‘damage’ that is compensable at law”
• observing that cases involving reputational harm such as \loss of goodwill or business relationships have involved situations where the dispute ... leaves one party unable to provide its product to its customers\
• “Typically, cases where courts have found irreparable harm from a loss of goodwill or business relationships have involved situations where the dispute between the parties leaves one party unable to provide its product to its customers.”
• “It is well-settled that a district court has wide discretion in the matter of security and it has been held proper for the court to require no bond where there has been no proof of likelihood of harm [to the non-movant].”
• “if the arbitrator rules as this Court believes he will rule, then the ‘damage’ to [the enjoined party] is nonexistent, because being forced to comply with contractual obligations that a party voluntarily entered into is simply not the sort of ‘damage’ that is compensable at law”
• “It is well-settled that a district court has wide discretion in the matter of security and it has been held proper for the court to require no bond where there has been no proof of likelihood of harm [to the non-movant].” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).