Revis v. Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when the language of the statute is plain and has a definite and sensible meaning, it shall be presumed to be the meaning the legislature intended
• “Where the workers’ compensation recovered by the insured is less than the total of the amounts due the insured under the PIP [Personal Injury Protection] and UM coverages, the insured is entitled to the difference.”
• “[U]ltimate aim [in statutory construction] is to effect the legislative intent.”
• “[I]t is ... clear that the General Assembly did not intend to prohibit duplication of all benefits. Thus, ... a recipient of UM [uninsured motorist] benefits is also entitled to recover under the PIP provisions of his or her policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).