Revesz v. Excess Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Agreeing with courts that ‘placed great emphasis on the word “actually,” indicating that it clearly negates con structive presence and possession.’
• Agreeing with courts that “placed great emphasis on the word ‘actually,’ indicating that it clearly negates constructive presence and possession.”
• exclusion applicable where insured was getting directions a few feet from vehicle at time of theft
• exclusion applicable where insured was getting directions a few feet from vehicle at time of theft
• exclusion applicable where insured was getting directions a few feet from vehicle at time of theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).