Revera v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in “permitting the State, on cross-examination, to have the defense psychologist refresh his recollection (thereby effectively impeaching defendant) by use of a privileged and confidential communication to the attorney’s investigator”
• holding that the trial court erred in “permitting the State, on cross-examination, to have the defense psychologist refresh his recollection (thereby effectively impeaching defendant) by use of a privileged and confidential communication to the attorney’s investigator”
• the privileged nature of a communication between an attorney and client is not lost if attorney inadvertently discloses it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).