Revenue Oil Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Washington state 15 courts have held that the State of Washington has not waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity 16 for purposes of actions under § 1983.”
• “Washington state courts have held that the State of 6 Washington has not waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity for purposes of actions under § 7 1983.”
• affirming dismissal 15 under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, based on the federal court’s lack of jurisdiction to determine 16 the validity of state court parental rights proceedings
• “[t]he mere allegation of a 27 conspiracy to affect the outcome [of a court proceeding] is insufficient to defeat 28 immunity”
• “Absolute immunity attaches to prosecutors and to other officers standing in their shoes for performing the traditional function of prosecutors: ‘initiating a prosecution and... presenting the State’s case.’” (quoting Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).