Revco D.S. v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CHINS finding was not an appealable final order because only after dispositional decree were the rights of the parties finally determined
• “Having concluded that Mother’s actions were detrimental to her children’s well-being, the trial court was entitled to believe that such conduct would continue in the absence of court intervention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).