Skip to main content
· 6/17/1996

Reubens v. New York City Department of Juvenile Justice

Citations

  • 930 F. Supp. 887
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8401
  • 1996 WL 339498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Court may not deny a motion to amend on the basis of delay absent a showing of bad faith or undue prejudice[.]”
  • “Unexplained undue delay is not a sufficient basis to deny a motion to amend, however, unless there is a showing that the defendant would be prejudiced by the amendment.”
  • “[A]s long as the [agency] conducts a sufficiently thorough investigation and the complainant is given a full opportunity to present his charges against his employer, a determination of no probable cause ... is entitled to preclusive effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.