Reubel v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 12(b)(3) does not apply to a motion to dismiss based on a contractual arbitration clause, citing Atlantic Marine
• holding that Atlantic Marine applies to cases involving clauses requiring arbitration outside the geographic boundaries of the district court
• holding that the defendant “should have brought a motion under the forum non conveniens doctrine to enforce” the arbitration agreement, but “whether [the plaintiff]’s motion is analyzed as one under Rule 12(b)(3
• explaining that the parties’ stipulation to dismiss a subset of defendants under Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) “dismissed the ‘entire action’ as it related to” these defendants
• observing that the procedural vehicle—Rule 12(b)(3) versus forum non conveniens—“does not impact the substantive analysis”
• observing that the procedural vehicle—Rule 12(b)(3) versus forum non conveniens—“does not impact the substantive analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).