Skip to main content
· 9/21/2001

Return To Home, L. L. C. v. Marllowe

Citations

  • 189 Misc. 2d 802
  • 735 N.Y.S.2d 914
  • 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that petitioner who failed to brief an argument forfeited it
  • noting that our court “will not remand if doing so will be futile”
  • observing “Salvadoran women who are viewed as property by virtue of their position in a domestic relationship” not legally-cognizable PSG because it was impermissibly circular
  • observing “Salvadoran women who are viewed as property by virtue of their position in a domestic relationship” not legally-cognizable PSG because it was impermissibly circular
  • upholding the IJ’s decision and declining to remand because it would be futile
  • “[Petitioner] does not brief any CAT- specific arguments on appeal, so that issue is forfeited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohan, Ling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.