· 9/21/2001
Return To Home, L. L. C. v. Marllowe
Citations
- 189 Misc. 2d 802
- 735 N.Y.S.2d 914
- 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that petitioner who failed to brief an argument forfeited it
- noting that our court “will not remand if doing so will be futile”
- observing “Salvadoran women who are viewed as property by virtue of their position in a domestic relationship” not legally-cognizable PSG because it was impermissibly circular
- observing “Salvadoran women who are viewed as property by virtue of their position in a domestic relationship” not legally-cognizable PSG because it was impermissibly circular
- upholding the IJ’s decision and declining to remand because it would be futile
- “[Petitioner] does not brief any CAT- specific arguments on appeal, so that issue is forfeited.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cohan, Ling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.