Rettig v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 653 Wrongful Prosecution of Criminal Proceedings (Malicious Prosecution) has been adopted as law in Pennsylvania
• noting that lawsuits are matters of public record and are not private facts
• indicating that to prevail on the merits for a tortious interference claim, a party must prove there was: (1) the existence of a contractual relation between the complainant and a third party; (2
• indicating that to prevail on the merits for a tortious interference claim, a party must prove there was: (1) the existence of a contractual relation between the complainant and a third party; (2
• finding mere existence of employment contract insufficient to infer that it would have been renewed
• lawsuit against plaintiff is a public, not private fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).