Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson and Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining since the mandate rule foreclosed the relief sought, the court did not need to decide “whether Rule 60(b) was an appropriate vehicle for the requested relief”
• finding no actual change in the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).