Skip to main content
· 5/31/2002

Retirement Systems of Alabama v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

Citations

  • 209 F. Supp. 2d 1257
  • 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1589
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10020
  • 2002 WL 1160169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that one concern this court had in exercising “related to” jurisdiction was the viability of the claims for indemnification
  • deciding first the question of subject matter jurisdiction in the motion to remand instead of the motion to transfer
  • noting absence of proof of claim filing
  • noting the court’s consideration of those factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albritton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.