Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/1/2009
Retention Alternatives, Ltd. v. Hayward
Citations
- 678 S.E.2d 877
- 285 Ga. 437
- 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1824
- 2009 Ga. LEXIS 287
- 2009 WL 1505307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that rule set forth in Stout, supra, applies under current version of OCGA § 33-7-11 (d)
- holding that rule set forth in Stout, supra, applies under current version of OCGA § 33-7-11 (d)
- the General Assembly is presumed to act with the full knowledge of the existing state of the law
- a statute is “presumed to be enacted by the legislature with full knowledge of the existing condition of the law and with reference to it”
- a statute is \presumed to be enacted by the legislature with full knowledge of the existing condition of the law and with reference to it\
- the General Assembly is presumed to act with the full knowledge of the existing state of the law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-06-15· cited 83×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-11-23· cited 38×
- City of Atlanta v. City of College ParkSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-03-28· cited 17×
- Hasty v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-10-07· cited 12×
- Shiv Aban, Inc. v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-03-29· cited 11×
- Chalk v. Poletto.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-06-21· cited 11×
- Walker v. Tensor MacHinery, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-11-16· cited 10×
- Jenifer Duncan v. Olga RawlsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-03-16· cited 10×
- Milliken & Company v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-02-13· cited 4×
- Chandler Telecom, LLC v. BurdetteSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-02-27· cited 4×
- Nissan North America, Inc. v. Walker-Jones Nissan, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-03-08· cited 3×
- Equipco International, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-13· cited 3×
- King v. PeeplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-08-13· cited 3×
- STATE OF GEORGIA v. SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVESupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-10-24· cited 2×
- VFH Captive Insurance Co. v. PleitezCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-12-01
- EMILY K. STRICKLAND N/K/A EMILY K. BASS v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-01-25
- Evon Sylvia Gallman v. Alfa General Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-05-12
- Equipco International, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-13
- MARGO KING v. KENNETH PEEPLESCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-08-13
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Vaughn v. CollumSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-04-06· cited 53×
- Bohannon v. JC Penney Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-04-06· cited 40×
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-10-16· cited 37×
- Alford v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-07-07· cited 35×
- Bohannon v. FutrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-11-08· cited 31×
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-10-06· cited 23×
- Reid v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-10-15· cited 20×
- In the Interest of B. C. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-11-03· cited 20×
- Scoggins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-11-12· cited 19×
- Stout v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-07-13· cited 15×
- Fender v. FenderSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-09-08· cited 9×
- Hayward v. RETENTION ALTERNATIVES LTD.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-04-18· cited 8×
- Jefferson Pilot Fire & Casualty Co. v. BurgerCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-10-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.