Skip to main content
· 7/29/1960

Retail Shoe & Textile Salesmen's Union, Local 410 v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 185 F. Supp. 558
  • 46 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2758
  • 1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no real dispute that the two-and-a-half-year gap between the filing of the Answer and defendants’ Motion for Leave to Amend constitutes a substantial delay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.