Skip to main content
· 9/30/1983

Retail Delivery Drivers, Driver Salesmen, Produce Workers & Helpers Local 588 v. Servomation Corporation

Citations

  • 717 F.2d 475
  • 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2820
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to rule on the parties’ timeliness dispute where the union had “claimed 2 a reason for finding it had complied with the timeliness requirements” of the collective bargaining 3 agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Hug, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.