Skip to main content
· 1/31/1996

Resure, Inc. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 42 Cal. App. 4th 156
  • 49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 354
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 1106
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 723
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a plaintiff bringing a rescission action must generally give notice in the complaint of his willingness to restore benefits if rescission is granted
  • “It has long been held that rescission is not the sole remedy for an insurer who has been subjected to misrepresentations and concealment of material facts by an applicant.”
  • rescission may be 2 asserted as affirmative defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogel (c.S.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.