Restuccio v. City of Oswego

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a “mere offensive utterance” cannot sustain an Unruh Act claim in the context of employment discrimination
• “There is an implied private right of action to enforce title VI’s core prohibition against 24 racial discrimination in federally funded program, to the extent the claims rest on intentional 25 discrimination, not disparate impact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).