Restaurant Teams International, Inc. v. MG Securities Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that adequate time for discovery had passed, even though discovery period had not yet ended, when case had been pending for seven months
• holding that adequate time for discovery had passed where case had been pending for seven months, even though no discovery order was entered by the trial court
• holding approximately eight months from filing of case to summary judgment hearing was adequate time where appellants initiated no discovery and failed to respond to discovery requests
• holding approximately eight months from filing of case to summary judgment hearing was adequate time where appellants initiated no discovery and failed to respond to discovery requests
• finding adequate time for discovery had passed where case pending seven months
• appellant failed to file affidavit explaining –10– need for further discovery for verified motion for continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).