Skip to main content
· 9/15/1876

Ressor v. Ressor

Citations

  • 82 Ill. 442

Syllabus

<p>1. Alimokt—not limited to one-third of income from husband's property. In fixing the amount of alimony which a woman should be allowed, the court is not limited to one-third of the increase or product of the husband’s property, natural justice would require that when the wife has contributed equally with her husband to the accumulation of property, she should have an equal right to its enjoyment.</p> <p>3. Same—ability of woman to work not to be considered in fixing amount. Where a husband and wife have lived together until they are too old to perform hard work, and have, by their joint labor, management and economy, acquired property sufficient to support them both comfortably, and the wife then obtains a divorce, she will be entitled to such an amount of alimony as will support her comfortably, without reference to her ability to labor, and thereby contribute to her own support.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In order to enable the court to enforce its mandate, or administer the proper penalty for disobedience, it is necessary that the officials derelict in performance of duty should be proceeded against personally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walkeb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.