· 8/5/2003
Resonate Inc. v. Alteon Websystems, Inc., Defendant-Cross
Citations
- 338 F.3d 1360
- 67 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1771
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16073
- 2003 WL 21802307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a disputed claim limitation is construed in the context of other words and limitations in the claim” (citing Brookhill–Wilk 1, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., 334 F.3d 1294, 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
- “[W]hen the written description sets out two different problems present in the prior art, is it necessary that the invention claimed, and thus each and every claim in the patent, address both problems? We conclude that on the record in this case, the answer is no.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Plager, Bryson, Plage, Prost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.