Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defense of mutual mistake does not require exhaustion
• commitment letter rendered two months prior to final loan considered contemporaneous with loan because \contemporaneousness requirement should be considered in light of commercial reality\
• claims process does not divest district court of jurisdiction where an affirmative defense is presented in response to an RTC claim
• commitment letter rendered two months prior to final loan considered contemporaneous with loan because “contemporane-ousness requirement should be considered in light of commercial reality”
• undocumented commitment letter was bilateral obligation because its provisions were corroborated by minutes of the board of directors approving the loan with the same provision, and the board’s submission form describing the loan to the members prior to approval

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).