Skip to main content
· 3/5/1993

Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of First Bankers Trust and Savings Association, F.A. v. Southern Union Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 985 F.2d 196
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 253
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4156
  • 1993 WL 39730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that designation of two corporate representatives without relevant knowledge \was tantamount to a complete failure of the corporation to appear\
  • holding that designation of two corporate representatives without relevant knowledge \was tantamount to a complete failure of the corporation to appear\
  • recognizing that when a party “has failed to designate an available, knowledgeable, and readily identifiable [Rule 30(b)(6)] witness, then the appearance is, for all practical purposes, no appearance at all”
  • holding that the presence of an unprepared 30(b)(6) designee constitutes \no appearance at all\
  • noting that the failure to properly designate a Rule 30(b)(6) witness can be considered a nonappearance justifying the imposition of sanctions
  • explaining that Rule 30(b)(6) “places the burden of identifying responsive witnesses for a corporation on the corporation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Duhé, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.