· 3/5/1993
Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of First Bankers Trust and Savings Association, F.A. v. Southern Union Company, Inc.
Citations
- 985 F.2d 196
- 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 253
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4156
- 1993 WL 39730
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that designation of two corporate representatives without relevant knowledge \was tantamount to a complete failure of the corporation to appear\
- holding that designation of two corporate representatives without relevant knowledge \was tantamount to a complete failure of the corporation to appear\
- recognizing that when a party “has failed to designate an available, knowledgeable, and readily identifiable [Rule 30(b)(6)] witness, then the appearance is, for all practical purposes, no appearance at all”
- holding that the presence of an unprepared 30(b)(6) designee constitutes \no appearance at all\
- noting that the failure to properly designate a Rule 30(b)(6) witness can be considered a nonappearance justifying the imposition of sanctions
- explaining that Rule 30(b)(6) “places the burden of identifying responsive witnesses for a corporation on the corporation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Duhé, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.