Resolution Trust Corp. v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Oregon courts would not limit doctrine to claims involving more than simple negligence.
• “The court concludes that the defendants have failed to establish as a matter of law that the claims for negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract accrued before January 10,1988.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Grant
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1995-06-27· cited 65×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 34×
• Lease Resolution Corp. v. Larney
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-09-23· cited 29×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Smith
  D. Oregon· 1995-03-02· cited 3×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-05-07· cited 1×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Smith
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-05-07· cited 1×
• Davie and Associates Dermatopathology P.A. v. Reditus Laboratories, LLC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2026-01-07