New Mexico Supreme Court· 12/17/1992

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Binford

Citations

844 P.2d 810
114 N.M. 560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding state court jurisdiction continues \after the administrative claims procedure has been exhausted\
assuming for purposes of that opinion that Congress can divest state courts of subject-matter jurisdiction over state-law claims by same standards as those for divesting state courts of presumed jurisdiction over federal causes of action
applying statutory amendment to prior version of the statute applicable to the case by “indulg[ing] the presumption that the [Legislature was aware that the law was not clear” and “interpreting] the amendment as a clarification of existing law”
trial court not precluded from considering issues not decided by Supreme Court on interlocutory appeal
a main purpose of the exhaustion requirement is to prevent surprise claims against the government
a main purpose of the exhaustion requirement is to prevent surprise claims against the government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ransom, Frost, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.