Skip to main content
· 5/26/1981

Resman v. Personnel Bd. of City of Chicago

Citations

  • 422 N.E.2d 120
  • 96 Ill. App. 3d 919
  • 52 Ill. Dec. 439
  • 1981 Ill. App. LEXIS 2716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the intent of the Chicago City Council in enacting [the ordinance] cannot be divined by resort to a statute passed by the Illinois legislature”
  • “Clearly, the principle of in pari materia can have no application to the instant case, since the intent of the Chicago City CouncU in enacting [the ordinance] cannot be divined by resort to a statute passed by the IUinois legislature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos, Downing, Perlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.