Residential Comms. v. Escondido Comm.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellee did not act with actual malice because, although it did not have authority to unilaterally enact an amendment to a condominium declaration, it had a good faith belief that it acted permissibly
• holding that appellee did not act with actual malice because, although it did not have authority to unilaterally enact an amend- ment to a condominium declaration, it had a good faith belief that it acted permissibly
• holding that appellee did not act with actual malice because, although it did not have authority to unilaterally enact an amend- ment to a condominium declaration, it had a good faith belief that it acted permissibly
• “If a defendant establishes a defense of good faith, or other privilege, however, a plaintiff must prove actual malice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).