Skip to main content
· 5/1/1981

Resident v. Noot

Citations

  • 305 N.W.2d 311
  • 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a reviewing court defers to an agency’s interpretation when the language subject to construction is ambiguous
  • explaining the general rule that this court should defer to an agency for interpretation of its rules on matters so technical that only the agency has the experience and expertise to understand it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amdahl, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.