Skip to main content
· 2/26/1993

Resident Council of Allen Parkway Village v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

Citations

  • 980 F.2d 1043
  • 1993 WL 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state housing authority that operated federally subsidized low-income housing project was not agency whose actions were subject to review under the APA
  • \[A]n amicus curiae generally cannot expand the scope of an appeal to implicate issues that have not been presented by the parties to the appeal.\
  • “district court lacked the power to enjoin [Housing Authority of the City of Houston] under the APA”
  • unnecessary to decide effect of Suter because statute at is­sue did not create federally enforceable right even under Wilder framework
  • “an amicus curiae generally cannot expand the scope of an appeal to implicate issues that have not been presented by the parties to the appeal.”
  • amicus constrained \by the rule that [it] generally cannot expand the scope of an appeal to implicate issues that have not been presented by the parties to the appeal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Johnson, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.