· 2/26/1993
Resident Council of Allen Parkway Village v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Citations
- 980 F.2d 1043
- 1993 WL 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that state housing authority that operated federally subsidized low-income housing project was not agency whose actions were subject to review under the APA
- \[A]n amicus curiae generally cannot expand the scope of an appeal to implicate issues that have not been presented by the parties to the appeal.\
- “district court lacked the power to enjoin [Housing Authority of the City of Houston] under the APA”
- unnecessary to decide effect of Suter because statute at issue did not create federally enforceable right even under Wilder framework
- “an amicus curiae generally cannot expand the scope of an appeal to implicate issues that have not been presented by the parties to the appeal.”
- amicus constrained \by the rule that [it] generally cannot expand the scope of an appeal to implicate issues that have not been presented by the parties to the appeal\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Johnson, Duhé
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.