Skip to main content
· 2/11/1986

Reserve Mining Co. v. Burrows

Citations

  • 381 N.W.2d 492
  • 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 3989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the prosecution to raise a new issue in its rebuttal because the defendant was prejudiced by having no “opportunity to rebut the State’s new argument”
  • noting Bailey was one of a handful of reported criminal cases in which convictions have been reversed because the State was allowed to raise a new and prejudicial issue in rebuttal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popo, Popovich, Sedg, Vich, Wick, Wozniak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.