Skip to main content
· 2/25/2000

Resendiz v. Miller

Citations

  • 203 F.3d 902
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2780
  • 2000 WL 146315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “drug- sniffing canine alert is sufficient, standing alone, to support probable cause for a search”
  • “A drug- 2 Case: 23-40045 Document: 00516974482 Page: 3 Date Filed: 11/20/2023 No. 23-40045 sniffing canine alert is sufficient, standing alone, to support probable cause for a search.”
  • “Probable cause exists when the totality of the facts and circumstances within a police officer’s knowledge at the moment of arrest are sufficient for a reasonable person to conclude that the suspect had committed or was committing an offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barksdale, Parker, Per Curiam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.