Resendes v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the opinion evidence of a non-examining, non-testifying psychologist was “too cursory to provide basis upon which to rest a finding that the claimant was not disabled”
• “it is not sufficient for the adjudicator to make a single, conclusory statement that the individual’s allegations have been considered” (quotations and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).