Skip to main content
· 1/9/2002

Research Systems Corporation v. Ipsos Publicite, Ipsos Usa, Ipsos

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 914
  • 61 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1355
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he decision concerning whether to grant a con- tinuance is left to the broad discretion of the district court”
  • stating that trial management decisions are subject to review for abuse of discretion
  • “[S]imple certified mail [is] a method permitted by Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention, so long as the foreign country does not object.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.