Republicbank Dallas, National Association v. Burt H. McIntosh Charles L. Snyder, Stan Patton and William D. Flemister

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it may be that there need not be applied in every instance a mincing on precise identity of parties and issues.
• noting that a “mincing insistence on precise identity” may not always be necessary but nevertheless defining “parallel” actions as “those ‘involving the same parties and the same issues’”
• observing that parallel cases are those that “involv[e] the same parties and the same issues” and that there may be no need for a “mincing insistence on precise identity of these in every case”
• finding federal and state actions which had some common issues were nevertheless nonparallel where “[t]he other issues are disparate, . . . and the parties are not the same”
• “[T]here need not be applied in every instance a mincing insistence on precise identity of parties and issues.”
• “[Courts] look both to the named parties and to the substance of the claims asserted in each proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).