Skip to main content
· 2/28/1986

Republic Steel Corporation v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corporation

Citations

  • 785 F.2d 174
  • 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1319
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff's argument that contract was not for a sale of goods \ignores the language of ... its complaint\
  • plaintiff’s argu- ment that contract was not for a sale of goods “ignores the language of … its complaint”
  • plaintiff’s argu- ment that contract was not for a sale of goods “ignores the language of … its complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Eschbach, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.