Republic of Iraq v. Beaty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unconverted action can continue to be adjudicated under § 1605(a)(7)
• holding that an unconverted action can continue to be adjudicated under § 1605(a)(7)
• observing that although Congress repealed § 1605(a)(7), courts “retain jurisdiction pursuant to § 1605(a)(7) over cases that were pending under that section when the Congress [repealed it]”
• observing that although Congress repealed § 1605(a)(7), courts “retain jurisdiction pursuant to § 1605(a)(7) over cases that were pending under that section when the Congress [repealed it]”
• stating that Rule 6(e) is “by any definition . . . a statute”
• stating that Rule 6(e) is “by any definition . . . a statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).