Republic of China v. Central Scientific Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a subpoena is unduly burdensome “if the information is wholly irrelevant under any reasonable legal theory,” but not if it rests on “a basis for a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law”
• vacating the magistrate judge’s award of sanctions under Rule 45(c)(1) absent a determination that the quashed subpoenas were issued in bad faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).