Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \Argentina ' \purposefully avail[ed] itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the [United States ]\ ' \
• holding that \Argentina ' \purposefully avail[ed] itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the [United States]\ ' \
• holding that “Argentina 1 “purposefully availed] itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the [United States]”’”
• holding that the issuance of bonds by the Republic of Argentina was a “commercial activity” within the meaning of the FSIA
• holding that Argentina’s bond payment rescheduling had a “direct effect” in the United States, where Argentina was to perform its ultimate contractual obligations, even though the bond holders were foreign corporations
• holding that Argentina's bond payment rescheduling had a \direct effect\ in the United States, where Argentina was to perform its ultimate contractual obligations, even though the bond holders were foreign corporations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).