· 4/3/2001
REPUBLIC NAT. BANK OF NY v. Pima County
Citations
- 25 P.3d 1
- 200 Ariz. 199
- 344 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
- 2001 Ariz. App. LEXIS 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a court cannot dismiss a claim on limitations grounds at the pleading stage unless “it appears on the face of the complaint that the claim is barred”
- appellate court may affirm ruling on any issue raised below even if unaddressed by superior court
- “[I]f it appears on the face of the complaint that the claim is barred[,] . . . [t]he plaintiff then must show the statute has not expired.”
- the “affirmative defense of a statute of limitations may be raised in a motion to dismiss if it appears on the face of the complaint that the claim is barred”
- regarding interpretation of statutes generally
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Espinosa, Druke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.