Skip to main content
· 12/20/1982

Reppun v. Board of Water Supply

Citations

  • 656 P.2d 57
  • 65 Haw. 531
  • 1982 Haw. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that “the continued satisfaction of the framers’ intent requires that the [riparian] doctrine be permitted to evolve in accordance with changing needs and circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Lum, Nakamura, Ogata, Menor, Temporarily

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.