Reposa v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding road construction work to be put to its intended use because \[t]he roads ... [we]re clearly in use\
• holding roads to be put to their intended use despite substantial defects
• distinguishing a case in which coverage was found when poor workmanship “caused damage to other property of the purchaser”
• defective workmanship, standing alone, is not occurrence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).