Skip to main content
· 7/29/1986

Repko v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 99 Pa. Commw. 289
  • 513 A.2d 518
  • 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the discount rate must reflect “the plan’s actual or anticipated investment experience”
  • “While there may be a reasonable range of estimates, the discount rate assumption cannot be divorced from the plan’s 20 anticipated investment returns.”
  • interest rate didn’t account for plan’s characteristics despite clear 18 statutory language requiring that it do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry, Colins, Craig, Crumlish, Doyle, Palladino, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.