Arizona Supreme Court· 1/17/2013
Rep Andrew Tobin v. Hon Rea
Citations
- 231 Ariz. 189
- 291 P.3d 983
- 2013 Ariz. LEXIS 25
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that language “must be free from any misleading tendency, whether of amplification, of omission, or of fallacy, and it must not be tinged with partisan coloring” (quoting Greene, 180 Ariz. at 590)
- “[T]he initiative proposes statutory changes that would impose a new, permanent, and legislatively unalterable tax, the revenues of which would be directed to different and broader uses than those under the current, constitutionally-imposed temporary tax.”
- “Misapplication of law or legal principles constitutes an abuse of discretion.”
- “Misapplication of law or legal principles constitutes an abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pelander, Bales, Brutinel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Debbie Lynn CopelandCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-30· cited 7×
- Quality Education & Jobs Supporting I-16-2012 v. BennettArizona Supreme Court· 2013-01-17· cited 3×
- Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-07-25· cited 2×
- State Of Washington, V. Gary Charles HartmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-08-22· cited 1×
- Lane v. ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-10-22
- Arizona for Abortion Access v. MontenegroArizona Supreme Court· 2025-04-03
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-11-02· cited 397×
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 203×
- Cronin v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court· 1999-12-17· cited 83×
- Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-08· cited 35×
- Arizona Legislative Council v. HoweArizona Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 17×
- Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 17×
- Citizens for Growth Management v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-08· cited 10×
- Healthy Arizona Initiative PAC v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.