Renovo Hospital Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that two of the officers, while on scene, did not fire their weapon or use force against the plaintiff and were entitled to qualified immunity
• reversing denial of qualified immunity “because it is not clearly established that the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine does not apply to § 1983 conspiracy claims”
• following Hendrix on “evidence nearly identical to that included in the present record”
• “As with qualified immunity, our jurisdiction is limited to issues of law, and this argument is, again, essentially one of sufficiency of the evidence.”
• plaintiffs produced no evidence of “an insurance policy or ordinance that purports to adopt a plan of self-insurance providing coverage for [their] claims”
• plaintiffs produced no evidence of “an insurance policy or ordinance that purports to adopt a plan of self-insurance providing coverage for [Plaintiffs’] claims,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).