Reno Hilton Resort Corp. v. Verderber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an order entered after the first phase of a bifurcated proceeding is not final, but interlocutory
• recognizing that an order entered after the first phase of a bifurcated proceeding is not final, but interlocutory
• concluding that NRAP 3A(b)(2) does not permit an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for a new trial
• noting that a SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA z writ petition is the appropriate vehicle for challenging judicial disqualification rulings
• noting a trial court’s error in refusing to give a jury instruction will be harmless 5 when it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury’s verdict was not attributable to the error
• \NRAP 3A(b)(2) does not permit an appeal from an order granting or denying a new trial motion addressed to an interlocutory order or judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).