Skip to main content
· 7/14/1921

Renner v. Stephens

Citations

  • 76 Pa. Super. 596
  • 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 195

Syllabus

<p>Replevin — Bailments—Sale by bailee — Right to recovery by bail- or — Case for jwry.</p> <p>In an action of replevin to recover an automobile, the case is for the jury, where the plaintiff has filed his statement averring ownership and the defendant, having retained the machine and given a bond, has filed an affidavit of defense alleging that he purchased the car from the plaintiff’s bailee, after the plaintiff had refused to pay a repair bill for which the bailee had a lien.</p> <p>In such case, an issue was raised for the jury, and it was error to quash the writ of replevin on the ground that the defendant was the bailee’s substitute and entitled to all his rights, including the lien for repairs.</p> <p>The plaintiff having filed his declaration and the defendant his affidavit of defense, the ease was for trial on the issue so raised, in accordance with the provisions of the Replevin Act.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Orlady, Porter, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.