Renner v. Muniz, etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that factfinder may infer discrimination where a reasonable employ er would have found the plaintiff to be “significantly better qualified for the job”
• concluding that the fact finder may infer pretext if “a reasonable employer would have found the plaintiff to be significantly better qualified for the job....”
• holding that reasonable factfinder could infer pretext in employer’s selection of another candidate over the plaintiff where the plaintiff was “markedly more qualified” than the selected applicant
• holding that “a plaintiffs discrediting of an employer’s stated reason for its employment decision is entitled to considerable weight”
• holding that ‘‘a plaintiff’s discrediting of an employer’s stated reason for its employment decision is entitled to considerable weight’’
• holding that factfinder may infer discrimination where a reasonable employer would have found the plaintiff to be “significantly better qualified for the job”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).