Skip to main content
· 6/5/1997

Renner v. Hawk

Citations

  • 346 N.C. 283
  • 487 S.E.2d 553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evaluating Claims Court jurisdiction under both CDA and Tucker Act, but addressing third-party beneficiary status only under Tucker Act
  • denying plaintiff’s third-party beneficiary claim because of failure to cite contract provision “which would ... allow plaintiff to enforce any rights against defendant”
  • determining Court of Federal Claims without jurisdiction to hear subcontractor claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.