· 6/5/1997
Renner v. Hawk
Citations
- 346 N.C. 283
- 487 S.E.2d 553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evaluating Claims Court jurisdiction under both CDA and Tucker Act, but addressing third-party beneficiary status only under Tucker Act
- denying plaintiff’s third-party beneficiary claim because of failure to cite contract provision “which would ... allow plaintiff to enforce any rights against defendant”
- determining Court of Federal Claims without jurisdiction to hear subcontractor claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.