Renee Unlimited, Inc. v. City of Atlanta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “concept of piercing the corporate veil is applied in Georgia to remedy injustices which arise where a party has overextended his privilege in the use of a corporate entity in order to defeat justice, perpetuate fraud or to evade contractual or tort responsibility”
• “A litigant... cannot submit to a ruling, acquiesce in the ruling, and still complain of same.”
• “A litigant . . . cannot submit to a ruling, acquiesce in the ruling, and still complain of same.”
• evidence supported jury finding that two corporations and their owner “were alter egos of each other”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).