Skip to main content
· 11/21/1975

Rene Vandenades v. United States

Citations

  • 523 F.2d 1220
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • on motion to vacate sentence, decision whether to appoint counsel is discretionary and will not be overturned in absence of fundamental unfairness
  • claim of unfulfilled promise to impose concurrent rather than consecutive sentences supported inferentially by sentencing judge's letter ambiguously suggesting he may have intended to impose concurrent sentences
  • claim of unfulfilled promise to impose concurrent rather than consecutive sentences supported inferentially by sentencing judge’s letter ambiguously suggesting he may have intended to impose concurrent sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gewin, Goldberg, Dyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.