Skip to main content
· 5/21/2002

Rene Rodriguez v. United States

Citations

  • 286 F.3d 972
  • 2002 WL 535408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting allegations of deficient performance because the advice of counsel that led the defendant to decide not to testify was neither incorrect nor unreasonable
  • affirming the denial of an evidentiary hearing when \[a] hearing would not have aided the district court\
  • noting that the petitioner’s original claim was filed within the deadline but the claim in his motion to amend was filed after the 2255 deadline expired, then proceeding to discuss whether the new claim related back to the original motion
  • affirming the denial of an evidentiary hearing when “[a] hearing would not have aided the district court”
  • affirming the denial of an evidentiary hearing when “[a] hearing would not have aided the district court”
  • petitioner sentenced prior to Apprendi waived his Apprendi claim by failing to raise it in district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Coffey, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.